<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nelmezzo &#187; Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nelmezzo.net/category/philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nelmezzo.net</link>
	<description>the wee blog right in the middle of it all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:45:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Logic and the limits of expression</title>
		<link>http://blog.nelmezzo.net/2007/06/21/logic-and-the-limits-of-expression/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nelmezzo.net/2007/06/21/logic-and-the-limits-of-expression/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dwright</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nelmezzo.net/2007/06/21/logic-and-the-limits-of-expression/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Carter at the Evangelical Outpost is defending that which all must uphold (even those who deny it, for they uphold it by denying it): the law of non-contradiction. But in the process, he takes a swipe at Walt Whitman that has me wondering about the proper limits of rhetorical and poetic language. Is it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Carter at the <a href="http://www.evangelicaloutpost.com/" title="Evangelical Outpost" target="_blank">Evangelical Outpost</a> is <a href="http://www.evangelicaloutpost.com/" title="law of non-contradictions" target="_blank">defending that which all must uphold</a> (even those who deny it, for they uphold it by denying it): the law of non-contradiction.  But in the process, he takes a swipe at Walt Whitman that has me wondering about the proper limits of rhetorical and poetic language.  Is it wrong for a poet to say something contradictory or to be unruffled by his self-contradictions? Does this make him an idiot?  Are there times when saying something that is propositionally contradictory or embracing contradiction can still be meaningful ? Joe has a powerful starting point for his annoyance over contradictoriness: an Episcopal priest who claims to be both Christian and Muslim. Surely, this has crossed lines of sanity and truth.  But what about Walt Whitman?  What think ye?  My two comments: (<a href="http://www.evangelicaloutpost.com/archives/003743.html#150423" title="comment 1" target="_blank">1</a>) and (<a href="http://www.evangelicaloutpost.com/archives/003743.html#150488" title="comment 2" target="_blank">2</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nelmezzo.net/2007/06/21/logic-and-the-limits-of-expression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
